09May2024

Mwathane Land Commission must strive to restore public confidence

LAND REFORMS IN KENYA AND AROUND AFRICA

This blog focuses on issues of land reforms in Kenya and around Africa and related matters

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that has been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login

Land Commission must strive to restore public confidence

Posted by on in Land Commission
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 418
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print
  • PDF

Land commissions are fairly recent inventions in Africa. They are consequential to innovative attempts to improve land governance systems around the continent, whose majority states are yet to optimize on the exploitation of land and natural resources. The commissions are established under contexts and with mandates that are jurisdiction-specific. The history, the state of land administration, the politics and priority development issues of the day inform their scope. As with ours, their performance in various countries has been rather chequered.

What were the fundamental issues that influenced the establishment of Kenya’s land commission? Irregular allocation of public land, and the need to repossess the land that had been so allocated, was primary. Historical land injustices formed the other cross-cutting issue. The other major concern was that the Lands Ministry was mired in serious service delivery irregularities. Consequently, out of frustrations, most stakeholders wished that this new “magic organ” could somewhat assume office and upstage the Ministry. Obviously, this was a little far-fetched, given the very nature of government, its command and resource allocation structures. As fate would have it, the promulgated constitution and the subsequently enacted laws ended up giving us today’s land commission.

On assumption of office, our first land commission started on an unfortunate note. Supremacy battles with the line Ministry, and subsequent contests over mandate, became routine. Subsequently, technical processes in the Ministry got undermined and service seekers were caught up in process uncertainties and delays for a long time. Some of this still persists. The Ministry stood its ground though. Ultimately, the differences over mandate were raised for determination by the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, reports of irregularities by the new commission began to hit public space. Indeed, towards the end of the tenure of the first group of commissioners, the chair and some of the officers were charged in court. At the close of its tenure, public confidence in the first commission was at an unfortunate low. Citizens and stakeholders had got totally disillusioned about it.

The new team of commissioners and their chair enter office against this background. The history and issues relating to the appointment process notwithstanding, the team must strive to spruce the commission’s public image. This is quite possible. First, it must quickly learn how to work around the existing state structure, and in particular, the Lands Ministry. It must also refrain from getting fixated with processing titles, and instead focus on the wider and important matter of protecting public land by establishing a credible national inventory. This remains a primary responsibility. Pubic land under the national and county governments, state agencies and schools remains vulnerable as attested by the numerous land grab stories around us.

The identification, mapping and registration of this land should be given priority. This will make it easier to protect and manage public land forwards. The next major priority will be to receive, hear and make recommendations on the resolution of historical land injustices countrywide. This is a subtle issue that can easily consume the commission. Attempts by the last team to address it opened up issues in parts of Kericho and Murang’a counties that simmer to date. The commission must appreciate that a casual approach to this matter has the potential to undermine county and national economies. Care and deep pre-consultations will serve it well.

Compensation for compulsorily acquired land for public projects can easily be the team’s trap door. The big compensation sums tempt from within and without. But commissioners and technical officers must beware that this role, due to its impact to the overall cost of public projects, will be greatly watched. Horse trading and deal-cutting on this must be resisted. Taming costs of land for projects would help Kenya a great deal. These simple measures will help to endear the new commission.

0
  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 09 May 2024

Blog Calendar

Loading ...