Many may have missed the rather ‘loud’ statistic contained in a story carried by the Sunday Nation just over a month back. That seventy percent of Kenya does not enjoy ownership documents in form of title deeds or leases! This should be of fundamental interest and concern to our social-economic planners. Because it essentially means that Kenyans in such places cannot effectively transmit their land rights on death. It means that Kenyans in these places cannot effectively negotiate with entrepreneurs who wish to establish land based investments. It means that agencies like KeNHA and KeRRA have great difficulties knowing who to negotiate the construction of their road corridors with since no maps or registers exist to help identify who owns what and where in this vast zone.

Those keen on the exploration and exploitation of minerals and oil in these areas have difficulties too. The Standard Gauge Railway, meant to enhance business in Kenya by connecting the country by standard rail between Mombasa and Kisumu, has faced similar challenges. The Lamu-Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia transport corridor intended to connect some neighbouring countries by road, railway and an oil pipeline through Northern Kenya will have to reckon with such difficulties too. This lacuna not only constrains business and development planning for the region, but also leaves it very vulnerable to land grabs.

Low cadastral cover

Global statistics reveal that Kenya isn’t alone in this regard. Cadastral coverage, which is basically a record of the surveyed and registered land within a jurisdiction, is comparatively low in Sub-Saharan Africa. But there are inspiring lessons around us. For instance, between 2009 and 2013, Rwanda managed to demarcate and register about eleven million land parcels, making it perhaps the only Sub-Saharan country staking a claim to a one hundred percent cadastral coverage, a statistic otherwise only associated with developed nations. Neighbouring Ethiopia, which is running a regional based land certification programme which captures occupancy and user rights in its first stage, may have hit twenty million land parcels by now. Yet the programme only commenced in 1998. These are very good lessons and should challenge Sub-Saharan Africa whose titling record remains very low.

From reports by the Lands Ministry, Kenya issued 5.6 million titles between 1963 and 2012. But between 2013 and now, another 3, 061, 000 titles have been issued, giving Kenya a total of about 8, 661, 000 registered parcels. Please be assured that this is comparatively big in Sub-Saharan-Africa, going by peer discussions at continental level. But, like the Lands Cabinet Secretary’s report cited by the Sunday Nation story indicated, we are only at thirty percent cadastral coverage. So we do have lots of room for improvement. And with today’s technology and equipment, this can be expedited at reasonable costs. But where do we issue more titles?

Recall the bedeviled Waitiki farm, Kihiu-Mwiri and Mboi-Kamiti companies? Until recently, these trouble zones had no ownership documents. But, after state interventions, they do. Embakasi Ranching Company is next on line. It has been a source of frustration and suffering for many. Tenure insecurity has been high in this fairly large tract of land which lies to the East of Nairobi city. Unoccupied or unguarded plots were vulnerable, prone to invasions and unauthorized construction. Plots would be allocated to multiple owners, leaving the final ownership subject to the crude practice of whoever is first-on-site or first-to-construct. Losers would be left holding mere papers. This fueled distrust, financial losses, insecurity and haphazard development. State intervention was therefore overdue and is certainly welcome relief to many. It’s hoped that the numerous land disputes, centered on irregular dispossessions and duplicated ownership, will be successfully resolved.

Extend titling

Similar state interventions should be extended to the other parts of the city where high value land remains without titles to date. Efforts should also be made to determine ownership rights in the informal settlements. Titling efforts should then be extended to the various company and cooperative farms that have since applied for titles but are held back by either official bureaucracy or unwilling boards of directors. Some group ranches fall within this category. There are also many market centers in rural Kenya where plot owners remain without titles. Some adjudication sections also remain incomplete. It’s time that barriers to their titling get removed. The ongoing titling of land for schools and state agencies will also help to secure public interest and improve Kenya’s cadastral coverage.

Then we have the community land zones which include parts of the Coast, and the Counties that formed the former North Eastern and the upper Rift Valley and Eastern Provinces. We need to fast track the application of the new community land law to rapidly map land for each of the communities and register them in favour of the community members. This will secure the land and bring these zones onto Kenya’s cadastre.

If all this is successfully done, spatial and social-economic planning will be greatly enhanced. The sourcing and management of land revenue will become a lot easier. Kenya will become a friendlier destination for business too.

Dated 15^th September, 2018